An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
Blog Article
nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair for the offender as well as the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Should the DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and continue according into the legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or even the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Generally speaking, higher courts don't have direct oversight over the lower courts of record, in that they cannot arrive at out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments of your decrease courts.
PLR is really a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Should you find an error while in the information of the published opinion (such as a misspelled name or a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
Only the written opinions with the Supreme Court plus the Court of Appeals are routinely readily available. Decisions from the decreased (trial) courts are not generally published or dispersed.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by legislation." It can be effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The existence of this power casts an obligation on the police, they usually must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its various pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are necessary to protect rather than abduct. Read more
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in the way that courts render decisions. Common law courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale powering their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the wider legal principles.
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there could be a person or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason for your decision with the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted within an argument.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It's also a very well-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or here whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.